Aug 16 2010
‘Bent on the Road—The Lowdown on the High Points of Riding a Recumbent
When I wrote recently about the self-effacing quality of some recumbent bikes (“‘Bent on Self-Destruction?“) I did so from the lofty perspective afforded by the highish seat on my diamond-frame Long Haul Trucker. In other words, my viewpoint was that of an external observer—a spectator, if you will. I’ve never pedaled a ‘bent. But Pat McKay has. In fact, he owns both a ‘bent and an LHT, and he puts a lot of miles on each one. And that’s why I was delighted to receive the following letter from him, which he graciously allowed me to reprint here. It gives Outside readers an insider’s understanding of both the highs and lows of ‘bent riding. Thanks, Pat!
Hi, Tamia!
Another interesting post. Like you I tend to wear bright colored jerseys when I ride. (The VeloWear LAB jersey that I recently purchased is quite noticeable). Like you I ride a Surly LHT, but I also ride a Barcroft Dakota-S SWB [short-wheelbase] recumbent. The past two years I’ve averaged 10,000 miles a year riding my various bikes, with the lion’s share of the miles just about evenly split between the LHT and the Dakota. Let me share some observations from riding my recumbent.
First, while it is true that the Dakota sits lower to the ground than the LHT, it has been my experience that drivers appear to see me much earlier on the recumbent than when I’m riding my diamond frame bikes. I base this observation upon the simple fact that approaching drivers tend to move over to the left much sooner (and further) when I’m riding the Dakota than when I’m on the LHT. It may simply be due to the fact that the wider seat on the recumbent gives the bike the appearance of a wider profile than the LHT, although my shoulders extend beyond the seat. It may also have something to do with the curiosity factor. There are a lot fewer ‘bents on the road than diamond frame bikes, so perhaps the apparent attentiveness of drivers is simply the result of their responding to a “what is that thing on the road” moment.
Second, I find that I must rely almost exclusively upon my mirror (I have one mounted on the bike and a Chuck Harris mirror mounted to my helmet) in order to see behind me when riding the ‘bent. It is just about physically impossible on a recumbent to turn around and look over your shoulder the way that you can when riding a diamond frame bike. And as important as it is for drivers to see me, I think that it is even more important for me to see approaching drivers. I could be lit up like a Christmas tree and wearing fluorescent clothing; but if the driver behind me is totally preoccupied playing with some electronic device, it may do me little good. I believe this to be a safety shortcoming in the recumbent design.
Third, another area of consideration when riding a recumbent is at intersections. Because your feet are in front of your head when riding a ‘bent, you cannot see approaching traffic quite as early as you can on a diamond frame bike. This shortcoming, however, has actually turned out to be a good thing because it effectively eliminates blowing through stop signs—not that I would do such a thing—at intersections, since you really cannot see approaching cars until the last minute. While I might be tempted to treat a stop sign as a yield sign when riding my LHT, no such temptation exists for me when I’m on the Dakota.
Now, of course, my experiences may be unique to me and the locations where I ride. While I have owned several different recumbents over the years—both LWB [long wheelbase] and SWB—none have been trikes or high/low racers. These designs tend to sit lower to the road than the touring recumbents that I have owned, and someone else would have to speak to any safety issues they have encountered when riding these ‘bents. I’ve noticed that when riding my recumbents—monster pickups and SUVs aside—I’m often at, or close to, the same height and position as a car driver.
I guess that I should also say something about the comfort issue. Most ‘bent riders will tell you that comfort was the principle reason why they started riding recumbents. In my case, however, this is not true. I find my LHT—properly set up and equipped with a Brooks saddle—to be just as comfortable as the Dakota. I was drawn to the recumbent design simply because I love all bicycles. One unexpected benefit of riding the recumbent was the ability to ride longer distances on “recovery days.” Riding a ‘bent uses a slightly different group of muscles than a diamond-frame bike. Not only has alternating the bikes that I ride made me a stronger cyclist, but it also allows my body to recover a bit while still spending time in the saddle.
Finally, a brief comment about neck strain on a recumbent; and again I cannot speak to riding recumbent trikes and high/low racers. When riding my Dakota touring ‘bent, it may give the appearance that I’m holding my neck up. But in actuality my neck muscles are not supporting the weight of my head at all. Imagine dropping your chin to your chest and then rotating your body to a nearly recumbent position. I routinely ride English and metric centuries on the recumbent, and the only tiredness that I feel at the end of the ride is in my legs.
I’ve included a picture of me riding my Barcroft ‘bent that my wife snapped several weeks ago while passing a field of sunflowers. It may help with the narrative above.
Take care,
Pat McKay

There you have it. A very well-traveled cyclist’s perspective on life on the road, as seen from seats both high and low. Thanks again, Pat—and thanks to Kitty for the accompanying photo!





