Jan 27 2010
Getting Physical: ItZa Drag! (Or Is It?)
When, not too long ago, I wrote a column entitled “The Versatile Prusik Hitch,” I figured that any article on the prusik that didn’t include a mention of its use in setting up a Z‑drag would be woefully incomplete. After all, the Z‑drag is a river‑rescue standby, having freed many a pinned boat from a rock’s unwelcome embrace. The reasons for its popularity are easy to see. It offers a 3:1 mechanical advantage — a great help when a party is short‑handed and the river is running high and fast — while requiring only a minimal inventory of gear: a rope, a couple of prusik hitches (readily made up from high‑breaking‑strength cord), two carabiners, and one or two slings.
Here’s what I had to say in the column:
Moving water exerts enormous force, and few paddlers are built like Arnold Schwarzenegger. So the Z‑drag is just the “force multiplier” we ordinary mortals need. In fact, bluewater sailors will note a close resemblance between the Z‑drag and the hauling tackle known as a “Spanish burton.” Both offer a (theoretical) three‑for‑one mechanical advantage. That means you can shift a 300‑pound load with little more effort than it would take to move 100 pounds unaided, though the Z‑drag suffers somewhat in comparison with its maritime counterpart, since carabiners don’t make very good pulleys. Still, even a little help goes a long way in a hard chance, and supplementary pulleys are available to improve the Z‑drag’s performance.
And I illustrated the point with the following sketch:

That was then. This is now. But to be on the safe side, I suppose I’d better reiterate the cautions from my original article. The drawing above is a simplified schematic. You can’t give it a once‑over and then rush out to haul your boat off a rock. Not if you value your life (and boat), anyway. In fact, you can’t learn any of the techniques of whitewater rescue or salvage just by looking at a picture. You have to practice the moves in real life, under the watchful eye of someone who already knows the ropes.
‘Nuff said? I hope so. In any case, back when I wrote the earlier column, I figured I’d pretty much covered the ground I wanted to cover. I’d highlighted an important application of the prusik hitch, while at the same time emphasizing the attendant hazards. In so doing, however, I accepted at face value the claim that the Z‑drag offered a 3:1 mechanical advantage. After all, no less an expert than Charlie Walbridge repeated it without question or caveat. But not all readers were convinced, and David Pitkin was one of the skeptics:
I just read your article on the prusik hitch. You say that you get a three‑to‑one advantage [with the Z‑drag]. [But y]ou need three pulleys to get that three‑to‑one advantage…. [Y]our rig shows only two pulleys, so it gives only two‑to‑one.
There was more in David’s letter, but you get the point. So did I. And it gave me pause. Had I made a mistake? Had Charlie Walbridge? I voiced my misgivings to Farwell, who has greater enthusiasm for engineering calculations than I do. But to my surprise he didn’t rush to blow the dust off his ancient slide rule. Instead, he suggested that we use what he calls “brute‑force methods” and put the Z‑Drag to the test… Read more…

Convenient carry-along energy-boosters are vital for anyone who cycles, paddles, and hikes. Everyone has their favorites. I like 






